Which of the following methods is most suited to detect fecal-oral pathogens?

Sentinel testing is highly effective for detecting fecal-oral pathogens because it involves using specially chosen animals or environmental samples that are susceptible to certain diseases, allowing for the monitoring of pathogen presence within a population over time. This method can help identify outbreaks and assess the risk of disease transmission in environments where fecal-oral pathogens may pose a threat.

In contrast, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is a molecular technique that detects specific genetic material from pathogens but may be limited if the pathogen load is low or if there is sample degradation. Serological testing measures the immune response to pathogens by detecting antibodies; however, it may not effectively indicate active infections at the time of testing, as antibodies can take time to develop. Culture techniques can identify viable pathogens from samples but often require specific growth conditions and time for pathogens to multiply, which can delay results and may not detect non-culturable organisms.